Loading…
Content is loading, please wait.Loading…
Content is loading, please wait.Shakopee · Scott County · Investment
Rankings updated July 2026
These 2 agents serving Shakopee have demonstrated investment expertise, independently scored on local knowledge, client reviews and market expertise — never who paid to be here.
| # | Agent | Score | Focus | Brokerage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tom Scott | 8.8 | First-Time Buyers | RE/MAX Advantage Plus |
| 2 | Mark Reiland | 8.1 | Waterfront | RE/MAX Advantage Plus |
$280K–$750K · 6 reviews
Tom Scott has sold real estate in Shakopee since 2001 and added a broker's license in 2010, working as an associate out of RE/MAX Advantage Plus's Shakopee office rather than leading a named team. Brokerage materials credit him with several hundred Shakopee sales and a career total in the high hundreds of closed transactions. Public review volume is modest — a handful of write-ups on Birdeye and Facebook rather than hundreds on Zillow — but every rating found is five stars.
$275K–$850K · 15 reviews
Mark Reiland has worked the south metro out of RE/MAX Advantage Plus's Savage office since 2000 and leads the small Reiland Team there. His public review record is real but thin — 15 Google reviews at 4.2 stars — and his brokerage profile lists a wide, generalist range of specialties rather than a narrow focus. Recorded sales cluster in Shakopee, Prior Lake, and Savage, consistent with a Scott County-centered practice. He holds a Certified Distressed Property Expert designation, relevant to short-sale and foreclosure work.
Tom Scott (8.8/10) is our top-rated investment agent serving Shakopee, scored on local knowledge, client reviews and market expertise — with zero paid placements.
We currently rank 2 investment real-estate agents serving Shakopee, each independently scored on the same five dimensions.
Every agent gets a 0–10 editorial score — a weighted average of local knowledge, client reviews, market expertise, response time and specialization fit. No agent can pay to rank higher. See our methodology for the full method.